Contact Us

Name

Email *

Message *

The Impact Of Shale Gas Technology On Geopolitics :

The Impact Of Shale Gas Technology On Geopolitics :

The Impact Of Shale Gas Technology On Geopolitics :

Are you looking this product? Now you can get product in EXE Format,just following step by step until finish you will be guided downloading this book for free, Enjoy it.

 The Impact Of Shale Gas Technology On Geopolitics :

.====> DOWNLOAD FOR FREE <====

Please follow instruction step by step until finish to get this for free. Enjoy It !!



Tufts University Fletcher School Lecture with Dr. Fine:

Fletcher Feature:



Dr. Daniel Fine of the Mining and Minerals Resources Institute at MIT addressed

Fletcher students at a talk sponsored by the International Security Studies Prog

ram and offered his insights into how the development of new technology will all

ow the United States to tap vast, previously inaccessible, resources of natural

gas that will impact everything from the price of gasoline to the ability of Chi

nese companies to buy equity in Russian natural gas fields.


The United States has a monopoly on hydro-fracking technology. The technology, shor

t for hydraulic fracturing, releases natural gas trapped in shale deposits by in

jecting the deposits with high-pressure water mixed with sand and small amounts

of chemical additives.


According to Dr. Fine, the cloud over gas used to be do we have enough gas? In 2003,

Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan declared that the United States did not

have enough natural gas, and that it would be necessary to import liquid natura

l gas (LNG). This, said Dr. Fine, was clearly a mistake in the light of the new

hydro-facing technology, not only because importing LNG poses a security risk to

the United States, but because tapping natural gas from shale represents an eco

nomic bonanza in the most [economically] repressed parts of the country: western New York, western Pennsylvania and West Virginia, areas which suffer from high rate

s of unemployment, and are estimated to host 490 trillion cubic feet of natural

gas. The thousands of jobs that could be created in these areas could stand in t

he way of President Obamas pursuit of subsidies for renewable energy.


Substitution away from imported gas by the United States will impact Russia, the

worlds largest exporter of natural gas, where gas production is controlled almos

t exclusively by government-run Gazprom. Moreover, Chevron has signed an agreeme

nt with Poland to search for and extract natural gas there, and similar arrangem

ents have apparently been made in Romania. When Chevron announces that they have

gas [in Poland], Dr. Fine said, then Russia is shut out, and will no longer be able

to act as a near-monopoly supplier of gas in Eastern Europe.


Seeing the threat to Russias interests, Dr. Fine suggested that Putin has de fact

o joined the friends of the Earth, claiming that hydro-facing will lead to problem

s with water supply. Beyond that, however, Dr. Fine pointed out that Gazprom has

recently acquired the largest gas field in Russia that was not already under it

s control, and that the location of this field, outside of Irkutsk, near the bor

der with China, gives a clear indication of the direction that Russian policy is

headed.


China is moving towards a gas economy rapidly to get away from the images and prob

lems associated of coal, said Dr. Fine. China is well aware that its reliance on

coal, and the emissions associated with it, not only present an environmental a

nd health threat to its own population, but that China is vulnerable to increasi

ng attacks from Western environmentalist groups as climate change becomes a more

prominent political issue. China does not have large gas deposits of its own, a

nd so, Dr Fine suggested, will want to take advantage of Russias weaker position

vis--vis Europe, to demand not only lower gas prices, but also the ability to pur

chase equity in Russian gas fields, something China has not yet been allowed to

do.


Returning to address some of the environmental concerns surrounding shale gas ex

traction, Dr. Fine said that, in light of the jobs that will be created , and in

light of the economic advantages of natural gaswhich is cheaper than either coal

or nuclear power, and far less expensive than any current renewable technologyi

will be politically difficult for any administration to challenge shale gas unl

ess it can be conclusively shown to have adverse environmental effects that outw

eigh the benefits. Shale gas wells, Dr. Fine said, are only used when an imperme

able rock layer surrounds them, so that none of the estimated 5.5 million gallon

s of water used for extraction can seep into the groundwater. In addition, most

wells can recycle their water, and ultimately, use less water than an average gol

f course.


Finally, Dr. Fine predicted that we are not, in fact, entering an era of peak oil

, that with the new production coming from the Iraqi oilfields, and with new natu

ral gas deposits replacing other petroleum fuels, we can expect to see a decline

in world oil prices. He predicted that on April 1, 2017 in Medford, Massachuset

ts, gasoline will cost barely over $ 1/gallon at the pump. Whether that predictio

n proves true or not, it certainly provides something to think about.


Elspeth Suthers, F11


http://fletcher.tufts.edu/news/2010/04/features/fine.shtml




Back To Top